Image 1 of 52
Image 2 of 52
Image 3 of 52
Image 4 of 52
Image 5 of 52
Image 6 of 52
Image 7 of 52
Image 8 of 52
Image 9 of 52
Image 10 of 52
Image 11 of 52
Image 12 of 52
Image 13 of 52
Image 14 of 52
Image 15 of 52
Image 16 of 52
Image 17 of 52
Image 18 of 52
Image 19 of 52
Image 20 of 52
Image 21 of 52
Image 22 of 52
Image 23 of 52
Image 24 of 52
Image 25 of 52
Image 26 of 52
Image 27 of 52
Image 28 of 52
Image 29 of 52
Image 30 of 52
Image 31 of 52
Image 32 of 52
Image 33 of 52
Image 34 of 52
Image 35 of 52
Image 36 of 52
Image 37 of 52
Image 38 of 52
Image 39 of 52
Image 40 of 52
Image 41 of 52
Image 42 of 52
Image 43 of 52
Image 44 of 52
Image 45 of 52
Image 46 of 52
Image 47 of 52
Image 48 of 52
Image 49 of 52
Image 50 of 52
Image 51 of 52
Image 52 of 52
Museum
This is our first hardcover photobook — very special.
I see your book as you probably see it—not as a group of individual images, but as a sequence, modulated by personal curiosity, modulated by pace. Traipsing through a museum, displaced as Museum.
Indeed, I think you see museum-goers as museum administrators now see them—just streaks of light and density moving through (gallery) space. I say that satirically because you see the virtue of the passage of light within architectures of contemplation whereas the administrators see it as a quantitative bounty, an admission of admission price.
Interestingly, when you do depict art-goers in a semirealistic dimension, it's usually mirrored in narcissistic doublings and triplings. So when we can “see” them, they are not contemplating the art, just their personal proximity to the stature that museums confer.
The hidden dimension also resides in a museum-historical realm—that art is eternal but the art-goers are evanescent. Substance lies elsewhere.
I also spotted a few self-portraits, captured in inescapable reflection. Maybe one of them sited inside the Stan VanDerBeek "Movie Drome."
—Steve Seid, retired museum curator
This is our first hardcover photobook — very special.
I see your book as you probably see it—not as a group of individual images, but as a sequence, modulated by personal curiosity, modulated by pace. Traipsing through a museum, displaced as Museum.
Indeed, I think you see museum-goers as museum administrators now see them—just streaks of light and density moving through (gallery) space. I say that satirically because you see the virtue of the passage of light within architectures of contemplation whereas the administrators see it as a quantitative bounty, an admission of admission price.
Interestingly, when you do depict art-goers in a semirealistic dimension, it's usually mirrored in narcissistic doublings and triplings. So when we can “see” them, they are not contemplating the art, just their personal proximity to the stature that museums confer.
The hidden dimension also resides in a museum-historical realm—that art is eternal but the art-goers are evanescent. Substance lies elsewhere.
I also spotted a few self-portraits, captured in inescapable reflection. Maybe one of them sited inside the Stan VanDerBeek "Movie Drome."
—Steve Seid, retired museum curator